Best ear training apps in 2026: an honest comparison

Most ear-training-app roundups copy each other. This one tries to be useful: nine apps, real strengths and weaknesses, and the one question you should answer before picking any of them.

Most “best ear training apps” lists are functionally identical: same names, same paragraphs, same lazy ordering. We are obviously not unbiased — we make one of the apps on this list. But Fifths exists because the existing apps each get something right and something wrong, and a learner who picks the wrong one for their goals can spend months drilling without much musical improvement to show for it.

This is a more honest comparison: what each app actually does, where it falls short, and which kind of learner it suits.

The one question to answer first

Before downloading anything, decide: are you trying to drill interval recognition or functional hearing?

  • Interval recognition is the textbook task: two notes play, identify the distance between them (minor third, perfect fifth, etc.). It is what almost every ear-training app does by default.
  • Functional hearing is what musicians actually use to follow songs by ear: hearing each note as a role in the key (the third, the fifth, the leading tone) rather than as a distance from another note.

The empirical case for prioritizing functional training is strong (see Why interval drills alone don’t make you hear music). Interval drills are necessary but not sufficient — they often produce learners who can pass an interval quiz but cannot transcribe a melody.

Some apps support both. Some only really support one. Ask the question before you commit.

The apps

1. EarMaster

The category default. A 1996 desktop product (Denmark) that has aged into a comprehensive web/iOS/Android app covering intervals, chord identification, scale identification, melodic and rhythmic dictation, and sight-singing. Hundreds of lessons. Uses a “guided cadence” mode for functional training and supports multiple notation systems.

Strengths: breadth, instructional polish, longevity (the curriculum is well-tested), cadence-priming on most lessons. Weaknesses: UI dates itself; subscription is on the higher end for a self-directed learner; the depth-of-curriculum can feel overwhelming for someone who just wants to start drilling. Best for: the serious student who wants one app that covers the whole aural-skills curriculum a music-school program would, and is willing to commit time to a structured path. Pricing (2026): Pro subscription ~$5/mo billed annually, with free tier on web.

2. Tenuto

iOS-only, made by the people behind musictheory.net. Twenty-some focused mini-drills (interval ID, chord ID, scale ID, keyboard reverse, fretboard reverse, etc.) presented as a clean, no-frills toolkit. One-time purchase rather than subscription.

Strengths: excellent design economy, no fluff, lifetime purchase, the drills work; pairs with the (free) musictheory.net lessons online. Weaknesses: iOS-only (no Android, no web), no curriculum structure or progress tracking, mostly interval-and-chord-quality oriented (not strong on functional/scale-degree mode). Best for: iOS users who already know what they want to drill and prefer one-time purchase to subscription churn. Pricing: ~$4.99 one-time.

3. Functional Ear Trainer (Korchan / Benbassat method)

The free, single-purpose app that the relative-pitch community keeps coming back to. Plays a I-IV-V-I cadence, then a single note, and asks you to identify the scale degree (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, b3, etc.). That is the entire app. Available on Android and iOS.

Strengths: the cadence-priming + scale-degree task is the canonical functional-ear exercise; free; minimal; the daily 10-minute habit it enables is exactly what builds the ear over months. Weaknesses: does only one thing — no chord ID, no rhythm, no dictation, no progress tracking; mobile-only. Best for: the learner who wants the gold-standard functional drill, alone, and is willing to graduate to other tools for the rest of the curriculum. Pricing: free.

4. Perfect Ear

The Android default. Free with ads, comprehensive, covers intervals, chords, scales, rhythm tapping, and includes a notation reader. Active development.

Strengths: breadth on Android (where Tenuto isn’t an option); free; rhythm coverage is genuinely useful and underrepresented elsewhere; pleasant UI for a free product. Weaknesses: ads in the free tier; the breadth is broad-but-shallow — none of the modules go as deep as a dedicated tool; functional-ear coverage is present but not the focus. Best for: Android users who want a single broad-coverage app to cycle through different drill types daily. Pricing: free with ads, optional pro upgrade.

5. Tonegym

Web-first, gamified, social. The product positions itself between a music-theory drill and a daily fitness habit — daily targets, streaks, leaderboards. The roster of “games” includes interval recognition, chord identification, melodic dictation, and a popular standalone vocal-range tester.

Strengths: gamification works for some learners; daily-habit framing is exactly what ear training needs; social leaderboard if you find that motivating; the free vocal-range-test tool is genuinely useful. Weaknesses: the gamification can feel infantilizing for adult learners; subscription pricing is in the higher band; the depth-vs-breadth balance leans breadth; functional/scale-degree training is light. Best for: learners who respond to gamification and streak mechanics, and want a daily-habit framing. Pricing: free tier with paid Pro/Premium subscription tiers.

6. Musictheory.net

Free, browser-based, founded in 2000. Mostly known for its theory lessons — clef reading, chord construction, key signatures — but the Exercises section includes the same drills Tenuto packages: interval ID, chord ID, scale ID, keyboard reverse. Strict, plain, fast.

Strengths: free, fast, no signup, no ads; the exercises load instantly and let you drill exactly what you want; the lessons are still some of the best basic-theory explanations on the web. Weaknesses: dated visually; no progress tracking; no functional-ear mode; no rhythm coverage. Best for: anyone who wants to drill interval/chord/scale recognition for free in a browser without committing to anything. Pricing: free.

7. Teoria

The Spanish-origin (now multilingual) free web tool that has been quietly serving music schools since the early 2000s. Comprehensive — interval, chord, scale, sight-reading, and rhythmic dictation modules — with explanatory content alongside.

Strengths: free, multilingual, available on mobile browser; the rhythmic-dictation module is one of the better free implementations. Weaknesses: UI is even more dated than musictheory.net; no real curriculum or progress; functional-ear coverage is light. Best for: music students whose teacher recommended a specific Teoria exercise. Pricing: free.

8. SoundGym

Different category — ear training for audio engineers and mixers. Drills include EQ identification (which frequency was boosted/cut), compression timing, panning resolution, and reverb-decay matching. Subscription web product.

Strengths: the only serious app in this niche; the EQ ear-training drills are widely respected in the production community; daily-habit framing. Weaknesses: unrelated to musical (pitch/harmony) ear training — different skill entirely; subscription cost is significant. Best for: producers, mixing engineers, audio professionals. Not for learners trying to hear music. Pricing: monthly/annual subscription tiers.

9. Fifths (this one’s us)

A 2025 web-and-mobile app that prioritizes functional, scale-degree-based training and uses spaced repetition to surface specifically the items each learner keeps getting wrong. The differentiation: every exercise is presented inside an established key (cadence-primed); session analytics show which intervals, scale degrees, and keys are tripping you up; the 12-key rotation tradition (jazz pedagogy) and the Voice section (with pitch-detection feedback) are first-class. We are biased; here are the trade-offs.

Strengths: functional-first curriculum (informed by tonal-hierarchy research and the Berklee/Banacos jazz-pedagogy literature); per-item spaced-repetition surfaces weaknesses without you having to track them yourself; web + iOS + Android; one-time $99 lifetime tier for the first 100 seats; no ads, ever. Weaknesses: newer (so less battle-tested than EarMaster); the lifetime tier is limited; the app deliberately does not gamify with streaks-or-die mechanics, which some learners do prefer. Best for: adult learners who want measurable progress on functional hearing, jazz musicians who want serious harmony coverage, and the learners who tried interval-only apps and bounced off them. Pricing: free to try (no signup); $4.99/mo Pro; $99 lifetime for first 100.

Honourable mentions

  • JazzEar and ToneSeed are smaller, jazz-focused apps that have started appearing in 2024-2025 listicles. Both are early but the jazz-specific framing is real and unmet by the bigger players.
  • Auralia / Musition are the conservatory desktop products. Comprehensive and expensive; mostly bought by music schools rather than individual learners.
  • MyEarTraining (Android, iOS) is a solid free-with-ads alternative to Perfect Ear with a smaller feature set.
  • Complete Music Reading Trainer is a niche pick for note-reading-on-staff specifically.

Quick comparison

App Platform Price Functional mode Best for
EarMaster Web/iOS/Android ~$5/mo Yes (cadence mode) Comprehensive curriculum
Tenuto iOS only $4.99 once Limited iOS, one-time purchase
Functional Ear Trainer iOS/Android Free Yes (only mode) Pure functional drilling
Perfect Ear Android-first Free + ads Limited Android breadth
Tonegym Web $$$ subscription Limited Gamification
Musictheory.net Web Free No Free interval/chord drills
Teoria Web Free Limited Free, school-aligned
SoundGym Web $$$ subscription N/A (engineering) Production / mixing
Fifths Web/iOS/Android $4.99/mo or $99 lifetime Yes (default) Functional + analytics + jazz

How to actually choose

Pick the app whose default mode matches the skill you’re trying to build. If you want to learn to follow songs by ear, you want functional/scale-degree training; the apps that lead with that (Functional Ear Trainer, Fifths) will get you there fastest. If you want to drill interval recognition for a music-theory exam, an interval-default app (Tenuto, musictheory.net) is fine.

The other rule: the best ear training app is the one you actually use for ten minutes a day. Spaced, daily practice beats two-hour weekend sessions by a wide margin (this is one of the more replicated findings in skill-acquisition research; see Spaced repetition for musicians). A free app you open every day is worth more than a perfect app you open twice a month.

If you want to read more on the underlying pedagogy, the Fifths science blog has 35 articles citing the primary research behind every claim above.

← Back to all articles